UNITED
NATIONS (NNN-PTI) -- India
has said the UN Security Council in its present structure is "completely
out of tune" with global realities and serves "no one's
purpose", asserting that an expansion in the 15-member body should have
permanent representation from Asia, Africa and Latin
America .
"The
Security Council as it is presently structured is not reflective of
contemporary realities, it is completely out of tune with what is happening in
the world," India's Permanent Representative to the UN Hardeep Singh Puri
told reporters, outlining the Council's monthly agenda.
"In
order to give the Council effectiveness there is need to enlarge its size. India 's point
of view is that the Security Council needs to be more transparent," he
said.
Puri
said the Council, in its present structure, "serves no one's
purpose", adding that an increase in its membership should have provisions
for permanent representation from Africa, Latin America, Caribbean and Asia .
He
said there could be consensus around modestly expanding the Council to
increasing the number of members to about 25.
On
the use of veto, Puri said while the provision should be retained, there needs
to be a discussion on the precise conditions and circumstances under which veto
should be used by countries. "There could be a veto restraint
agreement."
He
said some of the Council's permanent members would find it "extremely
difficult to justify their place on a new high table."
Expansion
of the Council does not mean "some permanent members should come off the
high table but they need to bring on board other countries which carry weight,
participate in the Council's work and will lend credibility to its image and
functioning," he said.
Puri
pointed out that non-permanent members of the Council are at a
"disadvantage" since by the time they come to grips with a particular
issue, it is time for their rotation.
"It
is very well known that permanent members woo the incoming non-permanent
members not in terms of using their margin of persuasion to change their views
but in order to get their support on the more difficult issues before the
Council," he said.
Asked
about countries like Pakistan
seeking permanent membership, Puri said if the South Asian country wants to be
a permanent member it should put its candidature forward and then let 193
members of the General Assembly decide by vote.
Responding
to the question on Pakistan ,
Puri said "some of the countries are so preoccupied with other things that
permanent membership of the Council is not even in their own reckoning but they
are acting as spoilers and I think we need to smoke that out."
Puri
said time has come to realise that expansion of the Council will not come from
within the Security Council but from traction within the General Assembly.
Several
outreach programmes are being undertaken which would lay the basis for putting
forward a more concrete proposal on expansion and reform.
"Countries
are clear in their minds which nations deserve to be permanent members and
which do not. Countries which do not have confidence themselves to become
permanent members resort to tactical ploys to confuse the process," he
said.
Referring
to the working methods of the Council, Puri said work of the UNSC severely
impacts not only the 15 members but also the 193 member nations of the General
Assembly.
"The
five permanent members think the Security Council working methods are their
exclusive prerogative. Things take a long time to change but change always
comes," he added.
He
said India
has written to member states to send inputs on how the working methods of the
Council can be improved and it seeks to put together a concept paper which will
incorporate these inputs and serve as a basis for comprehensive discussion on
the issue. --NNN-PTI
0 comments:
Post a Comment